Part after LSST Garbled by > in text – Space/Science

Space/Science » in reply to Typos Are Insignificant

Part after LSST Garbled by > in text

Marsby — 2/28/2009 5:16:19 AM (archived)

.....and LSST looks likely. They are not likely to detect 90% of objects > 140 m in ten years, but will in about 20 which is small compared to impact frequency. I'm very excited by these projects especially given the leaps in technology the Catalina program is making with far less capable assets. There is a whole lot more progress to be happy about in this space arena than in most others.

Regards,
Mark

The whole thread (8 posts)

Filure is expected result of current NASA NEO detection effort - E.P. - 2/27/2009 9:00:43 PM
- FAILURE is expected result of current NASA NEO detection effort - E.P. - 2/27/2009 10:02:54 PM
  - Typos Are Insignificant - Marsby - 2/28/2009 5:09:32 AM
    - Part after LSST Garbled by > in text - Marsby - 2/28/2009 5:16:19 AM
      - Long term impact risk for (101955) 1999 RQ36 - Socrates II - 2/28/2009 8:58:49 PM
        
        I'm A Lot More Worried About Apophis, What's Your Point? (n/t) - Marsby - 2/28/2009 9:26:55 PM
        
        No point other than a new NEO that is a potential threat to Earth - Socrates II - 3/1/2009 4:22:40 AM
        
        re: No point other than a new NEO that is a potential threat to Earth - marsby - 3/1/2009 6:02:45 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (8 posts)