I was dead wrong in assuming your post was a Flame of Lindy. I read the comparison between her and RL at the end and jumped to a conclusion. That doesn't mean it was appropriate - it wasn't. And it wasn't a Flame. As for your protecting me from making even more of an ass of myself, I've done that in bigger ways in more polite company and really don't need your beneficence. I don't hide that fact any more. Can't.

In regards to your "waiving" the suspension, I don't care. If it would do you good, suspend me. It's Robert's board, and in his wisdom you are his designated surrogate.

In regards to your claim, I don't believe you did censor RL in his relentless, vicious pursuit of Lindy. I would have noticed. I would have respected that. I think you'd like to think you could have done that, I just don't think you had it in you. I'd be delighted to see some documentation. I'd respect you more. Some, anyway.

I don't read SDAI, but I'm assuming he didn't complain, one of your highly touted criteria for censoring. Maybe he did, which would say a lot about him. You have stated that one of your tightly held principles is to let things go unless someone complains. Hmmm.

I did notice you compare Lindy's responses to that guy as similar to RL's stalking. Do you really believe Lindy's desire to tear SDAI a new one compares? Seriously? Is that what you claim to have censored in RL?

Frankly, I think you'd be afraid of RL.

Every once in a while you go 'round the bend. I don't know what the cause is, I just guess. And I can add that having you censor remarks about you as a moderator is an abuse of the system. However, as you know, I believe you abuse the system regularly.

In short, though, I don't believe you. I don't think you censored RL. I hope I'm wrong, I hope you did. I know you hassled Lindy, in an abuse of power. And against the "principle" you touted.

Arf