No executive experience, damn little in the Senate, and won his previous two major elections after his opponents had been destroyed prior to the election. A product of the Chicago school of politics, steeped in radical leftism inside and outside academia his entire adult life, and frankly, not nearly as smart as his devoted fans insist.

Knows jumping jack shit about economics, but that's pretty much par for modern Democrats. Spend more to fix the deficit, kneecap the private sector to increase revenues, the usual lunacy.

Standard foreign policy of appeasement of our enemies, and poking our allies in the eye. People tell me "look at how angry our adversaries were under Bush, and look how pleasant and smiling they are now." Well, sure. Before they were getting handed their asses. Now they're secure in the knowledge that the U.S. will essentially let them do whatever they want.

I notice he's getting tough on Honduras, but that's probably because they committed the only real crime leftists have ever recognized in a foreign government: preventing a Marxist from coming to power.

Obama won in 2008 primarily because of voter fatigue, an unwillingness to think very hard about it, the soft pink fog of "hope and change," and the joyous and endless leg-humping on the part of the media.

A survey question I have yet to see is "who did you vote for in 2008, and who would you vote for today?"

Meanwhile in Congress, Democrats blow off ethics investigations, tax evasion, lobbying issues, and all the other things that were all about "the culture of corruption" not than long ago.

But look over there! Palin! What a dummy!

I wouldn't pick Palin as my favorite presidential candidate, but then I wouldn't have picked McCain, either.