Interesting

Space/Science » in reply to Yes, light speed

Interesting

johannes — 8/28/2017 10:50:49 PM (archived)

Are you saying that if I entangle 2 photons and take one of them “x” number of miles away, then go back to the original spot and change the original state of the first photon then the second photon will change its position but only after the time that it takes light to travel to the entangled photon; if this is true then using the words such as “immediate” or “instantaneous” would be erroneous.

The whole thread (19 posts)

LIGO news - RL - 8/26/2017 4:10:07 AM
- Why are the propagation of gravitational waves limited to c? - mcfly - 8/27/2017 5:25:09 PM
  - Quod Erat Demonstrandum - RL - 10/16/2017 2:32:30 PM
  - It certainly can be no greater than c - RL - 8/27/2017 11:09:04 PM
    - Light speed ? - johannes - 8/28/2017 8:35:20 PM
      - Yes, light speed - RL - 8/28/2017 9:58:46 PM
        
        Interesting - johannes - 8/28/2017 10:50:49 PM
        
        No, that is not what I said... not even remotely... - RL - 8/28/2017 11:00:39 PM
        
        ?? - johannes - 8/29/2017 3:30:13 AM
        
        I meant just what I said - RL - 8/29/2017 6:20:56 PM
        
        What you said - johannes - 8/30/2017 2:28:04 AM
        
        Three times in this thread... - RL - 8/30/2017 7:10:37 PM
        
        Interesting concept. - johannes - 8/30/2017 8:39:37 PM
        
        sigh.... - RL - 8/30/2017 2:41:54 AM
        
        Johannes, you're as bad as Trump when he deliberately left out "on many sides..." - mcfly - 8/29/2017 3:15:29 PM
        
        Trump ?? - johannes - 8/30/2017 2:30:11 AM
        
        Yes, RL is doing a good job - mcfly - 8/30/2017 5:27:55 AM
        
        I do not understand how you can..... - johannes - 8/30/2017 8:42:25 PM
        
        I refer you to RL's post, "Three times in this thread..." - mcfly - 8/31/2017 11:09:32 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (19 posts)

Related discussions