TORONTO STAR
Nov. 26, 2002. 01:00 AM
Bush fails to meet moron criteria
The debate over whether George W. Bush is a moron continues to
sputter. Morons are outraged at being lumped in with the U.S.
president. Americans, meanwhile, are mildly amused that it has taken
Canadians so long to discover the obvious.
The controversy exploded last week when Francoise Ducros, an adviser
to Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, was overheard at a NATO meeting in
Prague saying, "What a moron," apparently in relation to Bush.
Morons say this is an outlandish slur. "We're nice people,"
explained one. "We don't threaten other countries or use the courts
to steal elections. George W. Bush may be a dangerous lunatic. But
he's no moron."
Chrétien seems to agree. "He's not a moron at all," the Prime
Minister told reporters on Thursday, referring to Bush.
Still, the opposition parties are not content. The Canadian Alliance
argues that if Bush discovers he is a moron, this could affect
Canada-U.S. relations.
Chrétien, however, says there is nothing to worry about. Bush, he
said, doesn't read Canadian newspapers
According to the International Dictionary of Medicine and Biology,
most morons are "educable and do not require institutionalization
but need some supervision in working at some simple job by which
they can become self-sustaining members of society."
Some have argued that this definition fits Bush to a tee. In most
matters, they note, he is carefully supervised by Vice-President
Dick Cheney, Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfield and Attorney-General
John Ashcroft.
Cheney and Rumsfield run Bush's wars while Ashworth stifles domestic
opposition. At home in the White House, first lady Laura Bush is
charged with watching over the president.
"Since the president's inauguration, he's only been left
unsupervised once - to watch a football game on television,"
recalled one expert. "And look what happened. He fell off the couch,
choked on a pretzel and hurt his head."
While the Canadian media have gone gaga over the Bush-is-moron
story, Americans seem to have taken it in their stride. "Once again,
Canadians have discovered the obvious," editorialized the Wall
Street Journal dismissively. "Duh, Canada" riposted the New York
Post.
In a lengthy analysis, the New York Times pointed out that Americans
have long made a practice of electing dead people to the Senate and
morons to the presidency.
"This kind of flexibility is what makes U.S. democracy so vital,"
the Times went on. "Why should the Senate be denied the wisdom of
those who have passed on? Why should the presidency be the preserve
of the mentally capable?"
Recent polls suggest that most Americans agree. A stunning 67 per
cent of respondents think that Bush is a moron compared with the
next largest category, 28 per cent, who believe him to be a space
alien.
Yet neither has affected his 82 per cent approval rating.
"He may be a moron," explained one respondent interviewed by
pollsters. "But he's our moron. He speaks our language."
Meanwhile, in Canadian journalistic circles, an ethical debate rages
over whether the original moron comment should have been printed at
all.
Ducros apparently made the crack in private conversation to one
journalist (who did not publicize it) but was overheard by another,
the National Post's Bob Fife, who did.
Chrétien says that Ducros was actually defending Bush.
"Fife overheard the words accurately," said one senior federal
source," but he didn't hear the punctuation.
"Francie didn't say `What a moron!' She said 'What? A moron?' and
then stormed out. She was reacting because the reporters were
referring to Bush as a moron and she couldn't bear the insult to
such a dear friend of Canada."
Still others say that Fife missed the possessive.
"We were all sitting around the briefing room waiting to find out if
Uzbekistan would be accepted as a member of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization," said one scribe. "Francie was doing the
crossword in the International Herald Tribune and the clue for six
across was a four-letter word for moron beginning with B.
"English isn't Francie's first language, so she asked everyone,
What's a moron? Bob just missed the apostrophe s."
However, to some media experts, the actual words said don't matter.
For a journalist to report something he heard, they say, could
destroy the entire edifice of source-based journalism.
"If political aides think they'll be identified when they badmouth
their bosses' opponents anonymously, they'll stop doing it," said
one.
"Then what would happen? The media would have no stories."
Still others defended Fife's actions.
"The moron story was a windfall for our members," said an official
with the Canadian Association of Columnists.
"Bush as moron? It doesn't get any better. Every two-bit columnist
in the country is taking advantage of this baby. They'll all be able
to go home early."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Walkom's column appears on Tuesday. He can be reached at
twalkom@thestar.ca.
Crossword Puzzle..........what's a four letter word for
