Paper Tiger
WRT "The working fluid may turn out to be CO2 - which topic Nick covered a few days back. Repeating the same hypothesis over and over again does not add in any way to its demonstration."
Whereas it is just fine for you to hawk your personal ideas again and again without including the slightest shred of technical back up or scientific justification, eh Ed? How is this any different than what you (falsely) accuse him of doing?
