Re: Our signals to E.T.

Space/Science » in reply to Re: Our signals to E.T.

R.L. — 12/6/2001 3:32:43 PM (archived)

Thanks...I had hoped that the mix of signals of the same frequency could be separated....somehow, but you make a good point....

But I still have hope of a group of aliens showing up wanting to join our "federation" and wanting to meet Kirk....
8^)

The whole thread (14 posts)

Our signals to E.T. - R.L. - 12/6/2001 1:38:23 PM
- And the survey says...! - DA - 12/8/2001 2:51:16 PM
- Here's something ironic. - Jacob Samorodin - 12/7/2001 8:05:19 PM
  - Re: Here's something ironic. - phil - 12/7/2001 8:07:49 PM
    - My sides are splitting. [n/t] (n/t) - Jacob Samorodin - 12/7/2001 9:16:21 AM
- Re: Our signals to E.T. - E'telekeli - 12/6/2001 3:20:11 PM
  - Re: Our signals to E.T. - R.L. - 12/6/2001 3:29:01 PM
- Re: Our signals to E.T. - Larry J - 12/6/2001 3:05:28 PM
  - PAL encoding - the upside-down view :-) - Nick Hoffman - 12/7/2001 11:44:43 AM
    - So ETI had best have some pretty sophisitcated receiving equipment - ebnelson - 12/7/2001 2:43:46 PM
      - NTSC & PAL are just two of them - Larry J - 12/7/2001 3:14:09 PM
  - Re: Our signals to E.T. - R.L. - 12/6/2001 3:32:43 PM
- BTW - R.L. - 12/6/2001 1:45:24 PM
  - Welcome back Robert - SDG - 12/7/2001 5:22:44 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (14 posts)