Hi Tom,

The universe is SO much more than visible space and galaxies, nebulas, etc.

All these amount to a solitary grain of sand upon an infinite beach.

The missing mass, which keeps galaxies in their shape is simply the supporting framework of high band energy our terrestrial dimension resides within - the cosmic ray and its energy is only the tiniest evidence and fraction of these massive and infinite energy flows.

Yes, the universe is simple, elegant and infinite. Everything flows in mathematical precision yet the 'infinite' factor makes it always new and everchanging.

In a finite universe - change would become impossible. A closed system is incapable of change. Change always requires conservation of energy - which is itself a fundamental (blatantly obvious!) evidence of the infinite nature of the universe.

Throw in 80% of observable galaxies that just HAPPEN to shape like INIFINITE logarithmic spirals (not circles, squares or squiggly lines) - and HOLD this shape in defiance of 'known' laws....and how much more evidence do we need to see that all galaxies and their shapes are formed by infinite energy flows?

The secret of creation is that there is NO creation....ALL exists in infinite dimensions and has a fundamental component interpretation represented mathematically by an infinite range of frequencies and wave forms ...

...constantly flowing
...never ending
...constantly changing all they contact.

As these waveforms condense and maintain a certain frequency and structure and manifest with a certain intelligence quotient in their structures... atomic structures are made manifest.

Starting with very simple structures like Carbon and building into complex ones like Uranium.

Uranium yields more energy because its complex structure was FORMED and is SUSTAINED by more energy - all flowing invisibly into the nucleus and orbiting in a sea of particles.

Our universe 'background radiation' is synonomous with carbon's fundamental frequency. This is simply evidence that our terrestrial realm uses carbon as a fundamental building block.

In 1946 Dr. Bart Bok of Harvard Observatory declared that the universe was only about as old as the earth. Previously the universe was held to be trillions of years old.

"The most direct evidence that the earth is not much older than the universe is to be found in the studies of the Milky Way."

"Our Milky way is held together by many loosely held together clusters of stars. As the Milky way is rotating rapidly around its central star clouds, the shearing effects resulting from the tidal pull of these central clouds would tend to disrupt loose aggregations of stars in a matter of a few revolutions."

"We know of no way in which star clusters are being formed at the present time. The presence of several hundred clusters on our Milky Way photographs indicates therefor e that our systems has not been rotating around its axis for more than a few revolutions."

"Everywhere in the universe there are signs of useful exuberance."

I find this amazing convoluted logic very sad. Heck the red spot of Jupiter has been spinning in a vortex for hundreds of years - in defiance of known scientific principles and atmospheric phenomenon.

Now we see the red spot is feeding upon smaller vortices (white storms). Does it take a genius to figure out that galaxies sustain their 'impossible' vortical shape by feeding upon other vortices in an endless supply?

And since these vortices are infinitely shaped so as to be capable of infinite flow and propagation, does it not make perfect sense that there are infinite energy flows manifesting as galaxies, stars and planets at certain points of their infinite journey?

To me it is all crystal clear and amazingly simple.

just call me Jimmy Neutron... ;-)

SDAI-Tech1