Re: More immediate, Thanks Nick,Dan & Tom

Space/Science » in reply to Re: More immediate danger than NEO ?

Johannes — 2/17/2002 3:30:16 PM (archived)

I got my info from space.com but could not find it there again. Dan I agree that the impactor element should be studied. However. The loss of atmosphere is just as final. And for Tom and others more speculation is at http://www.vianet.ca/~aapro/climate.htm

The whole thread (6 posts)

More immediate danger than NEO ? - Johannes - 2/16/2002 7:46:10 PM
- how many tons of radioactive elements - FrankC - 2/17/2002 11:21:47 AM
- Re: More immediate danger than NEO ? - Tom Brosz - 2/16/2002 8:01:47 PM
  - Re: More immediate, Thanks Nick,Dan & Tom - Johannes - 2/17/2002 3:30:16 PM
- Langley and RADIATIVE energy research - Nick Hoffman - 2/16/2002 12:24:21 PM
- Re: Everything is a more immediate danger than NEO . . . - D. Spires - 2/16/2002 10:15:43 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (6 posts)