I believe in GW research. GW advocates say it's time to act now without further research and ratify Kyoto, an expensive proposition that would cripple the US and give catre blanche to say China. I am concerned that it seems to me that much GW research is done by people predisposed and/or motivated to find evidence FOR GW. It is difficult for someone to work hard to prove that they need do no further research. In any case I'm skeptical about assertions that increasing CO2 will NOT warm the climate. Questioon is...how much? relative to what other aperiodic climate drivers? and what's worthwhile doing about it?

-p