Re: Is this not the RTG that some of us have planned to send to Pluto?

Space/Science » in reply to Re: Is this not the RTG that some of us have planned to send to Pluto?

Tom Brosz — 7/26/2002 4:33:19 PM (archived)

Careful with your math assumptions. One would assume that for a 2.65 GW power plant, one would not use the plutonium in a gigantic RTG, but in a more conventional reactor.

The whole thread (15 posts)

Is this not the RTG that some of us have planned to send to Pluto? - alcaray - 7/24/2002 4:56:07 PM
- To answer my own question: Yes. - alcaray - 7/26/2002 3:33:18 PM
- Re: Is this not the RTG that some of us have planned to send to Pluto? - SM - 7/24/2002 6:29:48 PM
  - Re: Is this not the RTG that some of us have planned to send to Pluto? - Tom Brosz - 7/26/2002 4:33:19 PM
  - Laser powered anchored elevator. - RobVG - 7/24/2002 7:03:49 PM
    - Re: Laser powered anchored elevator. - SM - 7/24/2002 3:27:52 PM
  - Re: Is this not the RTG that some of us have planned to send to Pluto? - ectoterrestrial - 7/24/2002 11:48:31 AM
    - 2.65Gigawatts!!2.65Gigawatts!!!! - Futureboy - 7/25/2002 3:07:32 PM
    - Re: Is this not the RTG that some of us have planned to send to Pluto? - SM - 7/24/2002 3:12:53 PM
      - Jeez, guys! - alcaray - 7/25/2002 3:35:53 PM
        
        Re: Powering a Space Elevator with RTGs - SM - 7/25/2002 7:54:38 PM
        
        Re: Jeez, guys! - Scott - 7/25/2002 10:11:16 AM
        
        So many beers, so little time - alcaray - 7/25/2002 11:05:51 AM
        
        Dortmunder - Scott - 7/26/2002 2:30:26 PM
        
        Pilzner Urquel, a fine beer (n/t) (n/t) - p - 7/25/2002 10:18:41 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (15 posts)