http://www.vision.net.au/~daly/bull-123.htm
Excellent. Addresses many of The issues I've tried to raise with you and contradicts your bogus claim that the models are far off from the real world. The fact is the natural variability of climate is on the same order of magnitude as current models predict for global warming so models can not be validated. I've tried to make this point numerous times. You only focus on the result not the why and use noise as an exuse to ignore a problem with an experimental basis for concern.
You have repeatedly ignored the fact that significant global warming will have to occur before any of the models can be validated and refused to address the potential consequences of waiting for a rise large enough to prove GW is a real threat.
Regards,
Mark
Space/Science » in reply to When you learn how scientific computing is done, then we'll take
And Needs To Read His Own Reference
The whole thread (17 posts)
- Temperature measurements over Antartica show a flaw in climate computer models
- Re: Temperature measurements over Antartica show a flaw in climate computer models
- Of course they're wrong!
