Re: L1

gbaikie — 9/30/2002 8:25:50 AM (archived)

Well, you explained it much better than I did. I must learn to try to keep it simpler.
But, I think that the trouble I went through attempting to clarify this issue was worth the effort.

The whole thread (16 posts)

So NASA shows 'interest' in sending humans to a Lagrange Point?...Why? - Jacob Samorodin - 9/28/2002 11:06:50 AM
- Re: So NASA shows 'interest' in sending humans to a Lagrange Point?...Why? - Raoul - 9/29/2002 9:47:08 AM
- Re: So NASA shows 'interest' in sending humans to a Lagrange Point?...Why? - gbaikie - 9/28/2002 12:09:07 PM
  - L1 - Nick Hoffman - 9/29/2002 3:03:37 PM
    - Re: L1 - gbaikie - 9/29/2002 9:58:33 AM
      - Re: L1 - Nick Hoffman - 9/30/2002 3:10:58 PM
        
        Re: L1 - alcaray - 9/30/2002 6:17:34 PM
        
        Your all wrong. What about L1 for the Moon and Sun. - Scott - 10/1/2002 5:25:03 PM
        
        And another thing. - Scott - 10/1/2002 5:29:37 PM
        
        'Nother superfluous post. Must learn to hit refresh once in a while. n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 9/30/2002 6:19:50 PM
        
        Re: L1 - Nathan Koren - 9/30/2002 5:51:33 PM
        
        Re: L1 - gbaikie - 9/30/2002 8:25:50 AM
      - Double Grr - gbaikie - 9/29/2002 10:33:48 AM
      - Re: L1 oops, they stuck together - gbaikie - 9/29/2002 10:01:02 AM
        
        Grr - gbaikie - 9/29/2002 10:03:25 AM
        
        Re: didn't include the "L":) - gbaikie - 9/29/2002 10:09:05 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (16 posts)