Re: opposite radar transmission to nullify radar

Space/Science » in reply to opposite radar transmission to nullify radar

Greg — 2/17/2003 6:27:39 PM (archived)

I think if it worked they would have tried it already. It would be easy to fool I think, just by randomly modulating the radar and then the cancelling signal wouldn't know how to follow it. Even occasional misses could still be read since the cancelling signal, if it missed the radar frequency and amplitude would be like broadcasting a homing beacon.

The whole thread (16 posts)

adaptive camouflage - Greg - 2/14/2003 1:05:37 PM
- Re: adaptive camouflage - Robert E. B. - 2/14/2003 1:19:33 PM
  - Re: adaptive camouflage - Greg - 2/14/2003 1:42:22 PM
    - Re: adaptive camouflage - Robert E. B. - 2/14/2003 1:48:32 PM
      - Re: adaptive camouflage - Greg - 2/14/2003 2:06:30 PM
        
        yeah, right.... - R.L. - 2/14/2003 7:06:44 PM
        
        Re: yeah, right.... - Greg - 2/15/2003 9:45:53 AM
        
        Far be it from me to throw physics in here... - Tom Brosz - 2/15/2003 7:49:47 PM
        
        Re: Far be it from me to throw physics in here... - Greg - 2/15/2003 3:07:16 PM
        
        Re: physics - Tom Brosz - 2/15/2003 4:54:47 PM
        
        Re: physics - Greg - 2/15/2003 6:12:40 PM
        
        and some more - Greg - 2/15/2003 10:08:43 AM
        
        Absorption is not equal to non-reflection - Nick Hoffman - 2/15/2003 2:36:50 PM
        
        Re: Absorption is not equal to non-reflection - Greg - 2/15/2003 3:43:48 PM
        
        opposite radar transmission to nullify radar - SDG - 2/17/2003 12:41:44 PM
        
        Re: opposite radar transmission to nullify radar - Greg - 2/17/2003 6:27:39 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (16 posts)