As much as you and Bowser would like to haul the discussion off the road with you, this is the point:
The Democratic Party and liberals went into a well-organized high dither over a conservative showing "disrespect" for women, hoping to shift the political focus away from the original Constitutional issue, not to mention multiple failed Democratic policies.
Unfortunately for their plan, it turns out that Democrats and liberals have a very long history of misogynistic behavior themselves. Even now they are being chummy with (and taking campaign money from) people who are infamous for misogynism.
There have been many other examples put out there in the past couple of weeks, of which I put forth two, conveniently packed into one blog entry. There are many more.
This conflict between the liberal moral position and their actions is what we call "hypocrisy."
The Democratic Party and their media pals are now quietly backing away from this phony issue. Obama is trying to kick this can into 2013 with his latest (Friday) "accommodation." Meanwhile the useful idiots remain, as usual, about two steps behind.
You can go back to squirting ink now.
Flame » in reply to Re: Obama and the war against women
You're flailing.
The whole thread (24 posts)
- Obama and the war against women
- Re: Obama and the war against women
- Re: Obama and the war against women
- 100 What does offense have to do with it? This was about yet another piece of the long history of rank liberal hypocrisy.
- Re: 100 What does offense have to do with it? This was about yet another piece of the long history of rank liberal hypocrisy.
- 100 What does offense have to do with it? This was about yet another piece of the long history of rank liberal hypocrisy.
