Hi Frank,

You wrote:
>"Lindy, it seems to me that every time you post a link to some specific information and that info is debunked by someone, you claim to have posted the link for info purposes only and plead lack of knowledge in the subject matter."

I have given PLENTY of valid links in the past, both here, and on that "other" board (the looney bin). I don't really expect any of you to follow the links, but a great percentage of them are well-researched, valid sites with a wealth of information. How you interpret them and what you choose to believe.....is ...well.......like shopping.
And your "debunked by someone" is only valid for a small percentage of all links. I have admitted in the past to putting out questionable material for the experts to look at; however the likes of PhilW, Ed and a few others mouth off with expletives and degrading phrases hoping to dismiss and impune my subject.
I'd say that 25% of the time, they are right, 25% of the time they are voicing an opinion, and the other 50% of the time they don't know what they are talking about.......

>"When you speak in generalities, you refer to years of reading and study of the subject matter."

Yes, and.....
Conspiracies and the underlying facts of the trade (the controlled press) fascinate me. I have made a hobby of it the past fifteen years, and have learned enormous amounts of information.
It's not for everyone. But what you're left with, is something you can sink your teeth into.

>"I have a close friend that believes very much as you do (including contrails) and he is equally unable to defend his positions beyond quoting obscure references from the lunatic fringe and short wave radio broadcasts. '

And you, the spoon-fed, media controlled, disinformation, sanitized-press believers, remind ME of an uninformed lunatic fringe......
Just my POV......