http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/302/nation/18_slain_in_Pakistani_church+.shtml
Finally, the Boston Globe gets around to reporting the massacre of Christians in Pakistan, instead of continuous page 1 lamentations about civilian casualties in Afghanistan. And what does the writer do? In the allegedly factual article, the writer comes out of left field and blames the attack on (guess who) Bush, both for his choice of words and for his military strikes into Afghanistan. To doubly emphasise the writer's bias, the writer concludes with Pakistani quotes lambasting our military strikes. The reporter did admit that this information was NOT provided or claimed by the attackers, i.e. it is the reporter's conjecture.
-philw (typical Boston Globe {owned by NY Times nowadays} "reporting")
An Example of Biased Reporting
The whole thread (25 posts)
- An Example of Biased Reporting
- Re: Phil, everything is our fault, you know that . . .
- Re: An Example of Biased Reporting
- Only biased if you are desperately looking for it...
- Re: Only biased if you are desperately looking for it...
- I don't see it Phil
