Re: A successor?

Current Events » in reply to Re: A successor?

Re: A successor?

Raoul — 12/4/2001 5:17:16 PM (archived)

Well, a world where religions are not influencing states would be a better world, I think! But then, if the jews claim rights in some areas of Jerusalem for religious reasons, the muslims must have the same right and the same kind of sovereignity for their religious reasons on their own tempel.

Raoul

The whole thread (11 posts)

It is as if - Raoul - 12/3/2001 7:12:03 PM
- Re: It is as if - Tom Brosz - 12/3/2001 8:09:36 PM
  - Re: Whether Arafat is a radical who believes Israel must be destroyed, or whether he believes that if he made peace with Israel, his own people would kill him (likely), the result is the same. - Scott - 12/3/2001 8:57:57 PM
    - Fourth Alternative - alcaray - 12/4/2001 11:33:51 AM
  - phil defends Clinton - phil - 12/3/2001 9:01:16 AM
    - Re: A successor? - Raoul - 12/3/2001 6:44:37 PM
      - Re: A successor? - Justin Kelly - 12/4/2001 1:54:24 PM
        
        Re: A successor? - Raoul - 12/4/2001 5:17:16 PM
        
        Re: A successor? - Justin Kelly - 12/4/2001 6:26:19 PM
- Arafat a moderate?? Nonsense. He's part of a Palestinian terrorist coalition - Matt Burley - 12/3/2001 3:10:36 PM
  - Re: Arafat is actually a moderator, and certainly NOT a leader . . . - D. Spires - 12/5/2001 5:40:18 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (11 posts)