Re: More acedemic supression of free speech

Current Events » in reply to More acedemic supression of free speech

alcaray — 12/6/2001 12:29:51 PM (archived)

Not enough info in the article to determine what provoked the harsh response. I don't know why you guys are willing to pass judgement with so little info on hand. Perhaps you are "in the know" about National Review editorials enough to know that they never spin.

Regardless, the harsh response in itself is wrong and regrettable. Sorry about that. Also sorry that the incident didn't make it to the front page as you all seem to think it should.

Do you know when the incident occurred?

The whole thread (16 posts)

More acedemic supression of free speech - phil - 12/6/2001 9:57:59 AM
- Re: More acedemic supression of free speech - alcaray - 12/6/2001 12:29:51 PM
  - yet another rationalization & excuse - phil - 12/7/2001 2:20:57 PM
    - Re: yet another rationalization & excuse - alcaray - 12/7/2001 5:05:16 PM
      - Re: yet another rationalization & excuse - phil - 12/7/2001 7:33:57 PM
        
        Good grief Phil! - alcaray - 12/7/2001 9:03:26 AM
    - Re: Yes, Phil. The kid's toast . . . - D. Spires - 12/7/2001 2:50:09 PM
      - Re: Right person, Phil, but wrong thread . . . - D. Spires - 12/7/2001 4:47:48 PM
  - This kind of nonsense has been going on for years - Larry J - 12/6/2001 1:23:45 PM
    - Re: This kind of nonsense has been going on for years - alcaray - 12/7/2001 4:54:21 PM
      - Re: Sorry, alcaray, but suggesting 'heckling' is a bad argument . . . - D. Spires - 12/7/2001 7:24:35 PM
      - No. They don't. - Tom Brosz - 12/7/2001 6:33:37 PM
        
        Yep they do - alcaray - 12/7/2001 9:06:35 AM
- Good effort on that HTML - SDG - 12/6/2001 10:19:46 AM
  - Re: Good effort on that HTML - phil - 12/6/2001 10:21:16 AM
- She committed heresy and had to be punished - Larry J - 12/6/2001 10:13:22 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (16 posts)