I agree, he should veto the bill.

Current Events » in reply to I think Bush is going to have to stand up for the Bill of Rights on this one.

Larry J — 2/15/2002 10:13:42 AM (archived)

Furthermore, he should address the nation to explain in no Press-filtered words exactly why the bill was unconstitional, therefore it had to be vetoed. Bush has proven he can address the nation and get his point across. By doing it so publically, he wouldn't have to worry about the message being filtered or distorted by the Press.

Having said that, I'll be surprised if he does it. In Washington, politics is more about gamesmanship than statesmanship.

The whole thread (11 posts)

Bush waffling on First Amendment? - Tom Brosz - 2/15/2002 7:08:43 PM
- Another interesting opinion on Democrat motivations... - Tom Brosz - 2/15/2002 7:18:38 PM
  - Massachusetts Democrats' actions - p - 2/15/2002 10:47:48 AM
  - I think Bush is going to have to stand up for the Bill of Rights on this one. - ebnelson - 2/15/2002 9:37:16 AM
    - Has anyone else noticed... - Tom Brosz - 2/15/2002 10:38:41 AM
    - I agree, he should veto the bill. - Larry J - 2/15/2002 10:13:42 AM
      - Text of the Bush speech - Mary Anne - 2/15/2002 10:38:24 AM
        
        Brava! [n/t] (n/t) - Fox - 2/15/2002 4:28:22 PM
        
        LOL (n/t) (n/t) - SDG - 2/18/2002 8:26:58 PM
        
        Re: Text of the Bush speech - p - 2/15/2002 10:41:14 AM
        
        Good speech! You could be the next Peggy Noonan. ;) - Tom Brosz - 2/15/2002 10:40:48 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (11 posts)