The circumstantial evidence is strong.

Current Events » in reply to Is Bowser the famous ol' Corky? lol

The circumstantial evidence is strong.

FrankC — 3/16/2002 6:45:20 PM (archived)

And, he hasn't bothered to deny it or acknowledge my innocuous questions on Flame

Bowser is always looking for apologies. All he has to do is deny it and I owe him one. I doubt that lying is an option for him.

They can run but they can't hide. :)

The whole thread (32 posts)

Lott retaliates for Pickering loss - Bowser - 3/16/2002 6:15:28 PM
- Do Nothing Daschle should enjoy his time as ML while he can. - ebnelson - 3/16/2002 3:23:10 PM
  - Usually... - alcaray - 3/18/2002 10:08:05 AM
    - Actually, that seems to apply to the House more than the Senate - Larry J - 3/18/2002 1:58:30 PM
- Re: Lott retaliates for Pickering loss - Tom Brosz - 3/16/2002 10:53:21 AM
  - Here's the windup - - - - Bowser - 3/16/2002 11:08:07 AM
    - Give it your best shot - FrankC - 3/16/2002 12:58:01 PM
      - Bowser flirt with hypocrisy? lol - ebnelson - 3/16/2002 3:24:43 PM
      - You're not too bright, are you? - Bowser - 3/16/2002 1:56:31 PM
        
        Obsessed with bright Corky? - FrankC - 3/16/2002 4:18:06 PM
        
        Is Bowser the famous ol' Corky? lol - ebnelson - 3/16/2002 5:55:51 PM
        
        The circumstantial evidence is strong. - FrankC - 3/16/2002 6:45:20 PM
        
        Yes, Bowser=Corky who slunk away from MSNBC politics boards in defeat (n/t) (n/t) - p - 3/17/2002 4:19:51 PM
        
        Good ol' Corky. He will be too drunk to post much today. - ebnelson - 3/17/2002 6:07:20 PM
    - Re: Here's the windup - - - - Tom Brosz - 3/16/2002 12:38:28 PM
      - Still the windup - - - - Bowser - 3/16/2002 12:52:04 PM
        
        "That doesn't mean I think I'm always right, I'm not. It does mean that I don't like to LOOK dumb." Croky/bowser.... - ebnelson - 3/16/2002 6:13:09 PM
        
        Throw the damn ball, or hit the showers - Tom Brosz - 3/16/2002 5:44:01 PM
        
        I'm going to move this over to Off Topic (n/t) - Bowser - 3/16/2002 6:41:28 PM
        
        Actually this is pretty amusing... - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/16/2002 5:58:33 PM
        
        Re: Actually this is pretty amusing... - Tom Brosz - 3/16/2002 7:53:54 PM
        
        Re: LOL . . .(n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 3/16/2002 6:51:49 PM
        
        What you consider "proof" and what others consider proof - Larry J - 3/16/2002 1:00:28 PM
        
        Yes, Larry, you can go outside and play. - Bowser - 3/16/2002 2:04:31 PM
        
        Re: Excuse me . . . - D. Spires - 3/16/2002 3:51:22 PM
        
        So, it seems your concept of proof is little more than... - Larry J - 3/16/2002 2:20:52 PM
        
        Ya see, Bowser is an expert investigator. Anything he says is fact, and any rebuttal made is simply posturing. - ebnelson - 3/16/2002 3:25:53 PM
        
        You and Frank. - Bowser - 3/16/2002 2:28:53 PM
        
        You've yet to show that he's forcing his views on ANYONE - Larry J - 3/18/2002 8:16:32 PM
        
        Re: Larry . . . - D. Spires - 3/18/2002 8:47:58 PM
        
        All these posts and not a single fact offered - Larry J - 3/17/2002 3:50:32 PM
        
        Re: He's got you there, Larry . . . - D. Spires - 3/16/2002 3:52:06 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (32 posts)