If Sadam's Successor is less stable than Sadam, then he will be easier to topple than Sadam.

I don't buy the agrument that we should keep the devil around, because a worse devil might take his place...If he's as bad as people say, then we should have gotten rid of him a long time ago. We need to start taking care of problems as they occur. Its great to try to predict the future, but in the case of Sadam, what could be worse than leaving him in power and on the verge of building nuclear weapons...What then? Good-bye Tehran? Meca? Medina? Hummmmm...Maybe thats what we're waiting for...I hope not.

Scott