I would think that attacking Iraq would be an admission that GHWB was a failure

Current Events » in reply to That, and oil, are the only purposes. And GHWBs pride. n/t

Scott — 9/4/2002 10:00:34 AM (archived)

He tried and failed to contain Sadam Hussain.

Yet many in the leftist media have adopted the position that GB is attacking Iraq to defend his father's ego...Which is it: Defending Dad's ego or correcting dad's failed policy?

Opps I forgot that on the left many like it both ways...

Scott

The whole thread (10 posts)

Iraq, War on Terror Cloud U.S. Elections . . . - D. Spires - 9/4/2002 8:20:55 AM
- That, and oil, are the only purposes. And GHWBs pride. n/t (n/t) - Bowser - 9/4/2002 8:31:57 AM
  - Why isn't oil worth fighting for? - Lee - 9/5/2002 8:05:51 AM
    - Re: Why isn't oil worth fighting for? - McFly - 9/5/2002 7:58:20 PM
      - Re: Lives are unimportant . . . - D. Spires - 9/5/2002 8:44:06 AM
    - Re: The human mind - Raoul - 9/5/2002 5:47:19 PM
      - But that still doesn't change the fact. - Lee - 9/6/2002 5:48:04 PM
  - For you, "n/t" must mean "no thought" - ebnelson - 9/4/2002 11:28:07 AM
  - I would think that attacking Iraq would be an admission that GHWB was a failure - Scott - 9/4/2002 10:00:34 AM
    - attacking Iraq - Tom Brosz - 9/4/2002 2:28:48 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (10 posts)