Re: Saddam

Current Events » in reply to Re: Saddam IS bad!

Re: Saddam

Tom Brosz — 9/20/2002 10:52:20 AM (archived)

So, let me see: We shouldn't attack Saddam because we have no proof that he has stockpiles of these horrible weapons, and we shouldn't attack him because if we do, he might use them.

Getting a headache now.

The whole thread (12 posts)

Saddam IS bad! - Bowser - 9/19/2002 4:16:22 PM
- Re: Saddam IS bad! - McFly - 9/19/2002 6:43:50 PM
- "To the contrary, it is such flamboyant hypocrisy that it invites contempt." - Short Comment - 9/19/2002 4:35:30 PM
  - Just ask Ashcroft! Or Bush! Or Rumsfeld! - FrankC - 9/19/2002 4:45:22 PM
    - Re: Just ask Ashcroft! Or Bush! Or Rumsfeld! - Raoul - 9/19/2002 6:33:58 PM
      - HIstorical precedent - Bowser - 9/19/2002 7:56:50 PM
        
        Re: Historical precedent - Tom Brosz - 9/19/2002 8:11:09 AM
        
        Patent nonsense and silliness. - Bowser - 9/19/2002 8:50:15 AM
        
        Re: Patent nonsense and silliness. - Bowser, you bad.........;~( - 9/19/2002 10:46:30 AM
- Re: Saddam IS bad! - But Attacking Iraq Could Be Worse - 9/19/2002 9:26:11 AM
  - Re: Saddam - Tom Brosz - 9/20/2002 10:52:20 AM
- Maybe the answer is to let Sadam off the Hook - Scott - 9/19/2002 8:32:49 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (12 posts)