<You expected me to read something with that heading? I'm sure you didn't.
Of course I did. Didn’t you notice that I was the one who posted it? Apparently you don't know me, or yourself. You have answered worse titles than this, and I did particularly expect you to read my posts in a thread that so clearly challenged you.
Now, can you tell me why this:
How weapons are accrued have nothing to do with how they are used.
...is so hard to understand?
And what's this?
There isn’t anything for a country like Iraq to do with anthrax and smallpox, etc., except biological warfare. The US didn’t give it to ‘em for biological research.
A country like Iraq. A poor little land that could never, ever have colleges, or simple medical research facilities. My, my...
That's it? Because YOU say so, it simply CAN’T happen?
ASK YOURSELF - Would these be the same weapons the US wants back? The ones the US gave 'em? How much sense does that make?
Yeah, we want our little sample-dishes taken off those warheads. Do you have a problem with this as well?
So, the US cannot take the moral high road with Iraq on that issue. That’s clear to anyone with a sense of morality, I’m sure you’ll agree.
What is wanted IS the moral high-ground, not Hussein's genocide, and that is where we stand.
Whose helicopters? US helicopters.
And here you claim U.S. pilots and crew were spreading toxins over the people of Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait?
Bowser, the toxins were already there when we arrived for Desert Shield. U.S. troops worked in it, unaware, breathing it, sleeping in it through Desert Storm. Kurds and Shiites died by the thousands after, during Provide Comfort.
These are IRAQI attacks, using WMD. The U.S. did NOT engage in WMD.
Inactive. Active service until out, then inactive reserves. Wasn’t a pilot in the active reserves who took off to work on Daddy’s campaign. And, had completed my active obligation. Different, right, than being in the active reserves and taking off? Going AWOL. As did our current President? I never did go AWOL, nor did they ever “lose” me.
Can you please provide evidence, such a one (1) military document that clearly states the man to be charged with AWOL?
Put it to bed? This one will never, B.
But I’ll surrender to your never ending battle for truth, justice, and the Bowserworld way -- since anything less would just be more of the same.
TTFN, little God,
Dan
Current Events » in reply to Dan - "Bowser chew toys"?
Re: Suffice, we're not going to see eye to eye on very much . . .
