Current Events » in reply to Then by all means

The whole thread (21 posts)

• Large anti-war protests deny claims of public support for war - Splinx - 10/28/2002 3:54:41 PM
  • ample testimony? - FrankC - 10/28/2002 5:18:09 PM
    • Indeed it is - Splinx - 10/28/2002 5:36:45 PM
      • How about this - FrankC - 10/28/2002 6:01:23 PM
  • Nope, they are tiny, but you are well organized - ebnelson - 10/28/2002 5:03:48 PM
    • No, they are enormous compared to those calling for war - Splinx - 10/28/2002 5:17:13 PM
      • Get a clue ........ - Gary - 10/28/2002 5:39:02 PM
        • I suggest you take your own advice - Splinx - 10/28/2002 5:44:40 PM
          • Ever heard of "standard deviation" - Gary - 10/28/2002 8:12:20 PM
            • There's no logic to your argument - Splinx - 10/28/2002 8:40:05 PM
              • Can someone else explain it to him? Thanks! n/t (n/t) - Gary - 10/28/2002 8:48:16 PM
      • Re: 200,000 pro-Bush march: You won't see it happen. We've got jobs. (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2002 5:35:47 PM
      • Mainstream USA does not march. - FrankC - 10/28/2002 5:27:35 PM
        • So you were there? - Splinx - 10/28/2002 6:00:12 PM
          • errata - Splinx - 10/28/2002 12:40:57 PM
          • In the 60's the cowards did not have to breed. Now they have. - ebnelson - 10/28/2002 9:41:30 AM
            • Re: In the 60's the cowards did not have to breed. Now they have. - Lindy - 10/28/2002 11:54:04 AM
        • Good one!! - Bowser - 10/28/2002 5:37:29 PM
          • Then by all means - FrankC - 10/28/2002 5:47:21 PM
            • zing. It'll go right over his head. (n/t) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/28/2002 6:07:51 PM
  • Links for Peace - Lindy - 10/28/2002 11:59:00 AM