Nope, not that one.

Current Events » in reply to Not Wit ?! :^(

Nope, not that one.

Bowser — 10/28/2002 12:17:39 PM (archived)

Merely alluding to that which I referenced doesn't constitute "wit". You didn't add anything, brought nothing to the party.

Now, that long string of "heh"s, that WAS wit.

Arf

The whole thread (19 posts)

Baby's first words......goo,goo..ooggoo..Cur..Cur..Curr...Currrrent Eeeevents!!! - €sunblok€ - 10/28/2002 5:08:40 PM
- Re: Well, this is certainly everywhere . . . - D. Spires - 10/28/2002 7:13:40 PM
- Re:pre-bowser..man we hade some good debates! (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/28/2002 6:04:33 PM
  - finesse and subtlety vs clubs (nt) (n/t) - FrankC - 10/28/2002 6:16:31 PM
    - Maybe because the (anti)MSNBC memory was still strong? (n/t) (n/t) - Tony - 10/28/2002 6:56:51 PM
  - Aw, Bowser's okay... - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2002 6:11:16 PM
    - Quality versus quantity... - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/28/2002 6:28:48 PM
      - You know me too well.... - Tony - 10/28/2002 6:55:37 PM
      - Re: Quality versus quantity... - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2002 6:42:26 PM
        
        LMAO ;-) n/t (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/28/2002 6:53:48 PM
      - I haven't got an older sister... - Mary Anne - 10/28/2002 9:04:11 AM
    - Drives most of 'em nuts, Tom. - Bowser - 10/28/2002 9:21:46 AM
      - Not Wit ?! :^( - FrankC - 10/28/2002 10:34:55 AM
        
        Nope, not that one. - Bowser - 10/28/2002 12:17:39 PM
- Methinks "Sunblock" is Thomas Less Ellifritz (n/t) - Lindy - 10/28/2002 11:41:03 AM
  - Re: Methinks - Fox - 10/28/2002 3:03:48 PM
    - Re: Methinks - Al - 10/30/2002 9:33:52 AM
    - Re: Neither are BC posters . . . - D. Spires - 10/29/2002 1:07:50 PM
    - Re: Methinks - Tom Brosz - 10/28/2002 4:26:13 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (19 posts)