That’s not good, is it? No, you can’t have that. Not at all.

Do you would prefer no action be taken to stop organized, international terrorism? Are you proposing negotiations with liars, thieves and murderers? What would you prefer? Tell me, Bowser. How would you propose stopping an organization from killing vacationers at will -- from killing theatergoers at will -- from killing shoppers at will -- from killing commuters at will -- from killing freedom at will?

How?

I think it's going to be a terrible two years. The innocent in the US and overseas will pay grievously, as an out-of-control military kills at will in the Third World.

That’s very funny, considering that is the exact goal of the current administration. To stop illegal militaries and terrorist operatives from killing innocents at will. You know, places like Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Kashmir, Iran, the Philippines -- the U.S.

It will be a rough two years, likely six -- at least -- but hardly terrible. The war will go on and many will die, that in itself is terrible, but we shall be victorious. Anything less is unacceptable, since anything less amounts to the end of freedom, the end of this great nation, the end of Western civilization, and the end to technological achievement. The end of the future. The end of life as we know it.

The birth of the next stone age.

Fight it all you will. The United States of America will still beat you -- “and your little dog, too.”

Dan