check again

Current Events » in reply to Re: Still nothing to say, I see . . . (n/t)

check again

Splinx — 11/11/2002 4:21:20 PM (archived)

Your "n/t" comment is inaccurate.

It was Bowser, not you, who actually did have something to say.

What was that again about "selective reading disorder"?

sp

The whole thread (12 posts)

Now, really. - Bowser - 11/10/2002 2:05:18 PM
- Part II - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/11/2002 6:18:10 PM
  - Pretty damn good, SDAI. (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/11/2002 8:12:48 PM
- Re: Still nothing to say, I see . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 11/11/2002 3:50:53 PM
  - check again - Splinx - 11/11/2002 4:21:20 PM
    - Re: The Bowser reference . . . - D. Spires - 11/11/2002 4:50:12 PM
- Me and my bloodthirsty conservative freinds were discussing this last night. - Scott - 11/11/2002 10:38:01 AM
  - bloodthirsty conservative friends - Tom Brosz - 11/11/2002 11:59:35 AM
    - Re: It's very rare . . . - D. Spires - 11/11/2002 1:39:54 PM
- Re: Now, really. - gbaikie - 11/10/2002 6:36:58 PM
- Re: Now, really. - Tom Brosz - 11/10/2002 2:52:03 PM
  - Bullfrog legs are rubbery but taste like chicken, li'l ketchup and ving goes great n/t - €sunblok€ - 11/10/2002 7:44:11 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (12 posts)