Your item 2. is false.

Further, I asked for specific posts, not vague references to "a thread a long while back about the Queens' crash."

Provide the specific post, or a link to it, and we'll go from there. I will be glad to address any specific points or counter-arguments, but your reliance here on vague language and wild exaggeration (as in your item 2) does not bode well for any serious discussion about these matters.

Of course, when presented with informed opinion or actual evidence, you can fall back on the shopworn tactic of dismissing any data with which you don't agree as coming from "irrelevant crank's websites."

This tactic is known as attacking the source (or messenger), and is a common hallmark of fallacious arguments.

The ball's in your court.

sp