I'm open to a similar liberal intellectual honesty test and I have in fact stated many times that while I really dislike Bush, I support overthrowning Saddam because in no way would I consider the two to be anywhere near the same. (I would however like to see an extension to the current proposed resolution by about a month to win over UN support.)
My point here was to have all the conservatives who routinely bash anti war democrats take an honest look at themselves and see if they would still hold to their pro war opinions were that opinion championed by someone they despise. Do they really believe war is an immediate necessity or are they just rooting on the guy they like? My grading of the answers are completely subjective and quite frankly tangential and irrelevent. The answers speak for themselves.
Current Events » in reply to A better test would be your liberal Intellectual Honesty Test
Re: A better test would be your liberal Intellectual Honesty Test
The whole thread (36 posts)
- Conservative Intellectual Honesty Test
- I supported him 1998 when he said he was serious about saddam.
- I'd be saying the same thing I am now...
- Conservative Intellectual Honesty...Is that like compassionate conservatism?........n/t (n/t)
- Yes, I would support Clinton
- A better test would be your liberal Intellectual Honesty Test
- Conservatives are pro-military...
- Using Serbia as a measure...
- You want Conservative honesty, here it is
- You're right
- Re: Conservative Intellectual Honesty Test
- Re: Conservative Intellectual Honesty Test
- Nice dodge, No grade n/t (n/t)