I'm not talking about disagreements over policy. Those are valid.

Flame » in reply to As always, you totally ignore the substantive criticisms. n/t

bowser — 5/28/2012 5:17:29 PM (archived)

I'm talking about the smears. They just don't have anything even after years and years of digging.

The whole thread (37 posts)

Getting serious for a moment. - bowser - 5/28/2012 7:07:11 AM
- Re: Getting serious for a moment. - Jody - 5/28/2012 7:00:38 PM
  - You had to hate Bush and Cheney, then. - bowser - 5/28/2012 8:39:28 PM
    - Re: You had to hate Bush and Cheney, then. - Jody - 5/29/2012 3:03:10 AM
      - Democrats character is everything, apparently. - bowser - 5/29/2012 3:24:13 AM
        
        Re: Democrats character is everything, apparently. - Jody - 5/29/2012 3:35:19 AM
        
        Re: Democrats character is everything, apparently. - TB - 5/29/2012 3:42:47 AM
        
        What is difficult? - bowser - 5/29/2012 5:06:28 AM
        
        Re: What is difficult? - Jody - 5/29/2012 3:26:21 PM
        
        And of course, there's sheer neutronium-level density. - TB - 5/29/2012 3:11:57 PM
        
        They just can't bring themselves to the logical conclusion- it was a lie. n/t - RobVG - 5/30/2012 2:41:52 AM
        
        God knows Obama wouldn't be the first author who baked his own biography to order. - TB - 5/30/2012 3:30:12 AM
        
        They wouldn't know..... n/t - RobVG - 5/30/2012 3:56:10 AM
  - Re: Getting serious for a moment. - Jody - 5/28/2012 8:04:09 PM
    - Welcome back! - Robert - 5/28/2012 9:51:33 PM
      - Re: Welcome back! - Jody - 5/28/2012 10:23:27 PM
- As always, you totally ignore the substantive criticisms. n/t - RobVG - 5/28/2012 5:07:38 PM
  - I'm not talking about disagreements over policy. Those are valid. - bowser - 5/28/2012 5:17:29 PM
    - Significant Democratic issues on Romney to date: - TB - 5/28/2012 6:40:49 PM
      - I think I said that was all the R's had on Obama. I know that's what I said. - bowser - 5/29/2012 12:00:33 AM
    - Just remember, "these Republicans" are a subset. n/t - RobVG - 5/28/2012 5:49:56 PM
      - I should have made that clearer. It's a tiered system. - bowser - 5/28/2012 6:57:21 PM
        
        You began with a flame and ended with a decent post. Thanks n/t - RobVG - 5/29/2012 2:33:22 AM
      - But how big a subset? - Robert - 5/28/2012 6:40:44 PM
        
        Nearly 50% of US voters are moderates - RobVG - 5/28/2012 7:06:49 PM
        
        50% are liberal and 50% are conservative - Robert - 5/28/2012 9:49:06 PM
        
        Do I actually have to import the damn chart? - TB - 5/28/2012 9:53:04 PM
        
        Almost missed you subtly trying to derail the conversation - Robert - 5/29/2012 2:13:13 AM
        
        I think you're flattering this discussion. - TB - 5/29/2012 3:14:57 AM
        
        I think you're evading the issue - Robert - 5/29/2012 3:19:21 PM
        
        "Radical??" Are you people even listening to yourselves? - TB - 5/29/2012 5:25:31 PM
        
        Percentages - TB - 5/28/2012 7:12:16 PM
- Re: Getting serious for a moment. - Jody - 5/28/2012 4:47:15 PM
  - Not to worry. - bowser - 5/28/2012 5:15:21 PM
  - Re: Getting serious for a moment. - Jody - 5/28/2012 4:49:15 PM
    - Re: Getting serious for a moment. - Jody - 5/28/2012 5:19:27 PM
    - Don't roll over on your back. - RobVG - 5/28/2012 5:14:42 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (37 posts)

Related discussions