Re: A Conflict Of Interest Is A Conflict Of Interest

Current Events » in reply to A Conflict Of Interest Is A Conflict Of Interest

LJ — 4/19/2003 4:51:43 PM (archived)

I don't think Chretien ever said or implied that it was a war for oil. It was the fact that it was not sanctioned by the UN that held Canada back. Canadians tend to hold international cooperation in higher regard than do some others.

And are no relatives of any politician allowed to have interests in any company?

The whole thread (16 posts)

A little bit on oil, Canada and Iraq - Tom Brosz - 4/18/2003 5:12:00 PM
- Fascinating... - Fox - 4/19/2003 7:20:11 PM
  - A and B - Tom Brosz - 4/19/2003 8:21:29 AM
- Re: But you are also in a conflict of interest !!! - SM - 4/19/2003 3:55:46 PM
- Re: Not les anglo-saxons (n/t) - Raoul - 4/19/2003 10:41:26 AM
  - Re: Not les anglo-saxons but... - Raoul - 4/19/2003 10:51:05 AM
    - Re: Not les anglo-saxons but... - gbaikie - 4/19/2003 3:43:43 PM
      - Re: EU-NATO - Raoul - 4/19/2003 5:59:16 PM
- Come on, Tom - LJ - 4/19/2003 8:29:57 AM
  - Re: Come on, Tom - McFly - 4/21/2003 2:04:30 PM
  - Okay, ya got me. - Tom Brosz - 4/19/2003 7:09:56 PM
    - Re: Okay, ya got me. - LJ - 4/19/2003 12:40:39 PM
  - A Conflict Of Interest Is A Conflict Of Interest - Mark Eby - 4/19/2003 2:45:52 PM
    - I didn't realize Chretien's son-in-law held an important office in the Canadian government - Mary Anne - 4/20/2003 9:55:27 AM
    - Re: A Conflict Of Interest Is A Conflict Of Interest - LJ - 4/19/2003 4:51:43 PM
    - You Know Like Bush Campaign Supporters and GW - Mark Eby - 4/19/2003 2:54:06 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (16 posts)