Bull Shit: "funded by the tobacco industry" Aha!

Current Events » in reply to Secondhand smoke pseudoscience challenged

David F Mayer — 5/16/2003 2:14:22 PM (archived)

Give me a break. 1000 studies show that second-hand smoke IS dangerous, 1 study, funded by the tobacco industry, shows that it isn't. What am I to believe?

Simple: second hand smoke IS dangerous.

David F Mayer

The whole thread (15 posts)

Secondhand smoke pseudoscience challenged - phil - 5/16/2003 12:28:47 PM
- On bias - LJ - 5/16/2003 4:30:48 PM
- Re: Secondhand smoke - Tom Brosz - 5/16/2003 4:11:11 PM
  - Obviously apples and oranges - alcaray - 5/16/2003 7:06:00 PM
  - One swallow does not make a summer. One study does not make a conclusion. 1000 other studies show that secondhand smoke is dangerous. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 5/16/2003 4:40:36 PM
  - Thank you for the link - Mary Anne - 5/16/2003 4:26:10 PM
- pseudoscience goes over well among some people here... - Davin L. - 5/16/2003 2:37:13 PM
  - Public Policy Is Not Science Even Though I Agree It Should Be More Like It - Mark Eby - 5/17/2003 5:41:51 PM
  - Definition - Fox - 5/16/2003 3:05:04 PM
    - Re: Definition - phil - 5/16/2003 3:40:14 PM
- Steve and Opus - Tony - 5/16/2003 2:24:24 PM
- Bull Shit: "funded by the tobacco industry" Aha! - David F Mayer - 5/16/2003 2:14:22 PM
- Psuedoscience Challenged - Don - 5/16/2003 1:33:43 PM
- My mother will be thrilled to know this. - Mary Anne - 5/16/2003 1:15:58 PM
- You a smoker phil? Ø (n/t) - et - 5/16/2003 8:50:17 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)