Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to Apparent fallacies in your defense of NASA

Somebody explain to me why I am bothering with this

Yes, the science return would be enhanced if they had planned the mission using a polar orbit.

To use a polar orbit would have entailed using a more powerful booster.

A more powerful booster would have cost more money.

I think you are using the word INADEQUATE [caps yours] as a perjorative. Let me be clear: I love Mars Express and hope for its brilliant success. I am in awe of the Russian's space accomplishments.

What I find INADEQUATE is your rabble-rousing, short-sighted analysis.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (28 posts)