I don't have to show you no steenking 'mechanism' -- ha!

Space/Science » in reply to Nothing wrong with heretical if you have some plausable mechanism.

BRFelix — 6/25/2003 3:00:42 AM (archived)

But....<;-0

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solar/picsol/halleynuc.jpg

If thy eye offend thee, pluck it out.

Maybe more to the point would be for one of the saviors of phenomena to explain in detail how Stickney was formed by impact.

Cheers, BRFelix

The whole thread (14 posts)

A different viewing angle for Phobos! (from MGS MSSS) - Raoul - 6/23/2003 5:51:14 PM
- What is the current best explanation for the linear features? - Tom Brosz - 6/23/2003 7:42:22 PM
  - Wild speculation - more learned opinions requested - Fox - 6/25/2003 5:32:25 AM
    - Rolling boulders. - et - 6/25/2003 4:32:17 PM
      - re: Rolling boulders. - Fox - 6/25/2003 11:11:34 PM
        
        Thats the pic.... - et - 6/26/2003 12:34:50 AM
  - Fractures from the Stickney impact dusted over with regolith. (n/t) - et - 6/23/2003 9:12:00 PM
    - Could be Stickney is not an impact formation - BRFelix - 6/23/2003 10:50:30 PM
      - Nothing wrong with heretical if you have some plausable mechanism. (n/t) - et - 6/24/2003 3:51:56 PM
        
        I don't have to show you no steenking 'mechanism' -- ha! - BRFelix - 6/25/2003 3:00:42 AM
- real real nice - and more craters - E.P. Grondine - 6/23/2003 7:14:30 PM
  - re: real real nice - and more craters - gbaikie - 6/23/2003 7:43:01 PM
    - Nice thought. - et - 6/23/2003 9:21:45 PM
    - re: re: real real nice - and more craters - E.P. Grondine - 6/23/2003 8:21:15 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (14 posts)