re: re: real real nice - and more craters – Space/Science

Space/Science » in reply to re: real real nice - and more craters

re: re: real real nice - and more craters

E.P. Grondine — 6/23/2003 8:21:15 PM (archived)

"what's wrong the idea of some of the material not leaving Mars' orbit and evenually forming into moons?"

The mechanics and the spectra, to start out with. Sorry, gb, but you'll have to take yuur own time to look them up - sorry, but I simply can't spare the time to do that right now...

all the best, and good hunting,
ep

The whole thread (14 posts)

A different viewing angle for Phobos! (from MGS MSSS) - Raoul - 6/23/2003 5:51:14 PM
- What is the current best explanation for the linear features? - Tom Brosz - 6/23/2003 7:42:22 PM
  - Wild speculation - more learned opinions requested - Fox - 6/25/2003 5:32:25 AM
    - Rolling boulders. - et - 6/25/2003 4:32:17 PM
      - re: Rolling boulders. - Fox - 6/25/2003 11:11:34 PM
        
        Thats the pic.... - et - 6/26/2003 12:34:50 AM
  - Fractures from the Stickney impact dusted over with regolith. (n/t) - et - 6/23/2003 9:12:00 PM
    - Could be Stickney is not an impact formation - BRFelix - 6/23/2003 10:50:30 PM
      - Nothing wrong with heretical if you have some plausable mechanism. (n/t) - et - 6/24/2003 3:51:56 PM
        
        I don't have to show you no steenking 'mechanism' -- ha! - BRFelix - 6/25/2003 3:00:42 AM
- real real nice - and more craters - E.P. Grondine - 6/23/2003 7:14:30 PM
  - re: real real nice - and more craters - gbaikie - 6/23/2003 7:43:01 PM
    - Nice thought. - et - 6/23/2003 9:21:45 PM
    - re: re: real real nice - and more craters - E.P. Grondine - 6/23/2003 8:21:15 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (14 posts)