This is a lot like "military sources," and other vague references. Names are rarely used, since it then becomes rapidly obvious that about five guys are the source of all these complaints. For example, almost every anti-Bush story referring to "former intelligence sources" generally turns out to be the same three or four disgruntled ex-CIA guys.

Sounds like the same number of people who saw Mr. Bush at the base where he was assigned! 8D Probably not the same people, though.

Can I help it if people link to articles that include stuff that manifestly doesn't support their position? If you guys keep shooting yourselves in the foot, I will continue to point to the blood on the rug. On the whole, if I respond to a post, I will have read the links. Thoroughly.

Regards--
Mary Anne