Long range Mars rovers

Space/Science » in reply to re: A Little More Detail Please

E.P. Grondine — 9/6/2003 5:27:23 PM (archived)

are required to satisfy the back contamination concerns.

These in turn require an artificially intelligent robotic vision system for autonomous control.

I know the only place to get it.

ep

The whole thread (24 posts)

Alien Infection article in Astrobiology magazine - BD - 9/4/2003 6:49:54 PM
- Is Your Problem That You Don't Read Your References Or That You Don't Understand Them? - Mark Eby - 9/5/2003 10:49:44 AM
  - you forgot to squak here Barry (n/t) - Buster - 9/18/2003 1:58:47 PM
  - References and debate - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2003 8:39:15 PM
    - A Little More Detail Please - Mark Eby - 9/6/2003 2:51:13 PM
      - re: A Little More Detail Please - Tom Brosz - 9/6/2003 4:17:42 PM
        
        Sounds Reasonable - Mark Eby - 9/6/2003 5:40:07 PM
        
        Long range Mars rovers - E.P. Grondine - 9/6/2003 5:27:23 PM
        
        Re: Yep, Darpa's Grand Challenge winner would be more trustworthy than anything associated with Grondine... (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 9/6/2003 8:27:34 PM
        
        Real Sorry, Chris, but most people don't give a rat's ass about sending men to Mars - E.P. Grondine - 9/8/2003 8:42:26 PM
        
        Still Haven't Bothered To Read Real Polls I see - Mark Eby - 9/8/2003 11:12:14 PM
        
        Still unable to understand the polls, I see - E.P. Grondine - 9/10/2003 8:28:00 PM
        
        re: Yeah, everything is black and white to you Ed and so clear...like as if you were on drugs... - Chris Vancil - 9/11/2003 7:17:44 AM
    - Duh - Buster - 9/5/2003 9:34:51 PM
- My stomach hurts, I hope it's just indigestion. - Lee - 9/5/2003 3:41:04 AM
  - Could be a case of "Happy Feet" - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2003 8:16:41 PM
- re: Alien Infection article in Astrobiology magazine - here is a real quack - BD - 9/5/2003 2:58:27 AM
- Just Imagine The Shock - Buster - 9/5/2003 12:32:29 AM
  - re: Just Imagine The Shock - BD - 9/5/2003 1:14:47 AM
    - Quacks don't debunk anything - Buster - 9/5/2003 2:01:36 AM
      - re: Quacks don't debunk anything -Buster the Canvas Mars Man - BD - 9/6/2003 12:47:34 PM
        
        Real Scientists Don't Debate By Bringing Up Irrelevant Topics or Making Accusations They Have No Evidence For - Mark Eby - 9/6/2003 2:00:17 PM
      - re: Quacks don't debunk anything..yes they do..you in your cnvas space suit - BD - 9/5/2003 2:50:03 AM
        
        you're clueless again but I was wrong too - Buster - 9/5/2003 1:42:47 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (24 posts)