What is truly funny is how it is so obvious you don't get that while claiming you are doing scientific work.
Now if you were a scientist even an amatuer one you would address technical critiques of your positions such as the ones below in some fashion other than "zubbie suit zubbie suit nananana" or posting marginally related copies of others work.
<a href="http://www.habitablezone.com/space/messages/293486.html>; Is Your Problem That You Don't Read Your References Or That You Don't Understand Them?
The Evidence For Meteorite Mediated Transfer of Life From Mars IF IT EXISTED
Review of The Back Contamination Issue
Your Panspermia Contradictions
Articles On Manned Mission You Won't Find At ICAMSR This is not so much technical commentary as links to technical articles refuting more of your ignorant claims.
Re On Barry's Bio This is also not technical commentary either, but rather commentary on your lack of understanding of what matters in science.
Boy will I be surprised if you demonstrate your expertise consists of more than an ability to chant Zubbie suit Zubbie suit again.
Regards,
Mark
Space/Science » in reply to re: Quacks don't debunk anything -Buster the Canvas Mars Man
Real Scientists Don't Debate By Bringing Up Irrelevant Topics or Making Accusations They Have No Evidence For
The whole thread (24 posts)
- Alien Infection article in Astrobiology magazine
- Is Your Problem That You Don't Read Your References Or That You Don't Understand Them?
- My stomach hurts, I hope it's just indigestion.
- re: Alien Infection article in Astrobiology magazine - here is a real quack
- Just Imagine The Shock