re: Blix and weapons
This is not the UN inspector's report. This is some think tank putting it into their own words. I still see no actual reference to weapons found after 1992. All of the other stuff could be unused facilities and work started before then. It does indicate how you made no effort to actually find out what happened from the source, you just picked this one because it suited your preconceived ideas.
I also think the whole idea of calling Blix a liar compared to second hand sources like this is just an attempt to hide from the truth.