NASA's current impact risk assessments are as bad as their foam strike damage estimates were

Space/Science » in reply to NASA Is On Target to Reach Spaceguard Goal With Less Money & Smaller Scopes

E.P. Grondine — 10/17/2003 6:23:30 PM (archived)

and those responsible for rather shamelessly and viciously promoting them deserve to be fired for doing some really bad science and endangering the general public.

Now as for internet windbags, I suggest that internet Mars nuts such as Mr Eby need to look in the mirror.

As for a detailed engineering study by some of the best professionals as to what needs to be done, it can be found here:

www.prospace.org/oldsite/mstorm/mstorm02/docs/CAPS_SUMMARY_HQ_100201_97.pdf

ep

The whole thread (10 posts)

Discovery Channel Telescope - SteveS - 10/16/2003 11:43:07 PM
- More Telescope News - Mark Eby - 10/19/2003 3:34:44 AM
- Working Link Indicates This Will Trump NASA's NEA Detection Program - Mark Eby - 10/17/2003 2:06:20 AM
  - Astronomers How Much Will It Help? - Mark Eby - 10/17/2003 4:07:31 PM
  - internet gassbags and NASA gold plating - phil - 10/17/2003 3:20:14 PM
    - And stacking the images should reveal even more n/t (n/t) - SteveS - 10/17/2003 4:52:00 PM
    - NASA Is On Target to Reach Spaceguard Goal With Less Money & Smaller Scopes - Mark Eby - 10/17/2003 3:49:30 PM
      - NASA's current impact risk assessments are as bad as their foam strike damage estimates were - E.P. Grondine - 10/17/2003 6:23:30 PM
        
        They Are Not NASA's - Mark Eby - 10/18/2003 6:01:11 PM
      - agree with your post (n/t) - p - 10/17/2003 4:30:06 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (10 posts)