Current Events » in reply to Nor has a Bush drowned any women, either n/t

The whole thread (29 posts)

• Question on Bush hatred for the left - FrankC - 11/12/2003 12:11:00 AM
  • Its not about "hate"... - Donald - 11/12/2003 3:18:12 PM
    • No it is not about just hate... - ebnelson - 11/13/2003 1:12:26 PM
    • Thanks for the attempt at an answer - FrankC - 11/12/2003 4:04:51 PM
      • Quit yer bitchin, I'll take a whack at it. - et - 11/12/2003 9:19:12 PM
        • Clinton probably a better party guy - FrankC - 11/12/2003 9:53:51 PM
    • And tell me Donald, what would this "replacement" do in Iraq? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/12/2003 4:02:13 PM
      • imagine if France had invaded Iraq - Greg - 11/13/2003 6:06:22 AM
        • more on governing to avoid humiliation rather than doing things properly - Greg - 11/13/2003 6:12:51 AM
      • Easy one Tom - FrankC - 11/12/2003 5:15:09 PM
  • Don't know if anyone here is a "Bush hater" as such - Tom Brosz - 11/12/2003 3:29:03 AM
    • The election of 1864 is instructive in this. - ebnelson - 11/12/2003 4:38:48 AM
    • Yes, but it makes such flashy rhetoric and is sunch a nice red herring to throw around - Davin L. - 11/12/2003 3:56:41 AM
  • The Hatred is a Bush vs. Kennedy thing. - Scott Evil - 11/12/2003 12:20:18 AM
    • On the contrary... - Tom Brosz - 11/12/2003 3:26:46 AM
    • Naah - FrankC - 11/12/2003 2:39:00 AM
    • Nobody has shot a Bush either (n/t) - Mary Anne - 11/12/2003 1:08:57 AM
      • Nor has a Bush drowned any women, either n/t - Larry J - 11/12/2003 1:33:33 AM
        • OK, that's it, I'm outta here. - Mary Anne - 11/12/2003 4:46:00 AM
          • Tubby is just iritable from the caloric restriction. He needs an emergency porterhouse, STAT! (n/t) - et - 11/12/2003 9:05:26 PM
            • Bringing the post quality right up there, aren't we? - Tom Brosz - 11/12/2003 10:05:50 PM
              • Nope, just the status quo.... - et - 11/12/2003 10:12:29 PM
          • Why is what he said any sleazier than what you said? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/12/2003 5:06:32 AM
            • Because I dared to point out the truth about "America's Royal Family" - Larry J - 11/12/2003 2:50:13 PM
              • Isn't that what CBS said? (n/t) - et - 11/12/2003 9:03:42 PM
                • If you're referring to the "Reagan" miniseries... - Larry J - 11/12/2003 9:48:39 PM
                  • I'm sure they meant a "fair and balanced" portrayal. (n/t) - et - 11/12/2003 10:04:05 PM
            • Neither was sleazy and both were true (n/t) - ebnelson - 11/12/2003 1:45:19 PM
            • re: Probably because John Kennedy wasn't Ted Kennedy just as Bush Sr isn't Bush Jr (n/t) - Raoul - 11/12/2003 6:44:31 AM