(Clinton lied under oath. Bush inflated the intelligence on Iraq"

Current Events » in reply to re: Labelling

Lindy — 1/16/2004 6:19:06 AM (archived)

So, let's put George W. under oath too.
What's good for one is just as good for the other.
(psst....Tom. Clinton's blowjob was an embarrassment to Clinton and his family and half of America thought less of him. It cost NO money and NO lives. It didn't upset half the countries in the world and have millions protesting in the streets. Bush's lies, on the other hand has cost PLENTY).
With all your blustery posts, you have yet to see any relevance in the comparison.

The whole thread (13 posts)

Statistical evidence in: at least 1 in 6 Democrats is officially a "Bush Hater." - Tom Brosz - 1/14/2004 6:42:58 PM
- But not so fast... - S - 1/14/2004 11:56:50 PM
  - re: But not so fast... - Tom Brosz - 1/15/2004 12:14:30 AM
    - BTW... - Tom Brosz - 1/15/2004 12:20:21 AM
- Reminds me of something else - Tony - 1/14/2004 8:32:58 PM
  - Except that... - S - 1/14/2004 9:54:05 PM
    - Like hell they weren't. - Tom Brosz - 1/14/2004 10:14:56 PM
      - re: Like hell they weren't. - S - 1/14/2004 11:47:53 PM
        
        Just for fun... - Tom Brosz - 1/15/2004 12:00:20 AM
        
        Labelling - Mary Anne - 1/15/2004 3:17:09 PM
        
        re: Labelling - Tom Brosz - 1/15/2004 5:54:12 PM
        
        (Clinton lied under oath. Bush inflated the intelligence on Iraq" - Lindy - 1/16/2004 6:19:06 AM
        
        "The line is not always easy to see, and although I can't think of an example off-hand, Lord knows I have probably crossed it more than once." - Tony - 1/15/2004 6:32:46 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (13 posts)