We'd have to figure out what "recruit" and "hit on" really meant. Some men will come on stronger than others, both homosexuals and heterosexuals.
I would think "recruit" would be more than a strong pass, occur over time and "no" would not be respected. I'm sure that happens with homosexuals dealing with straight men, and I'm sure that happens with heterosexuals dealing with young or married women.
When my friend said that homosexuals are interested in homosexuals he was talking about the vast majority, just as we usually talk about the vast majority of heterosexuals. And I think one problem homosexuals can have is determining if a man is hetero- or bi-sexual.
The big difference to me is if "No, thanks" was respected. I sort of think that "no harm, no foul" from soccer applies.
I only figured out what a homosexual was at 18, they were nice guys, never made a pass at me, and I've never been afraid of them. However, I don't want to hear or imagine what they do, I simply can't imagine it. It has to be hereditary, because no one could possibly choose to do that stuff.
Off Topic » in reply to I made no indictment of anyone, let alone "every" anything.
I think we understandably got tangled up in a semantic trap.
The whole thread (9 posts)
- Don't ask, don't tell, and a conversation with a gay man.
