"Carrying water?"

Flame » in reply to If Romney didn't want to be attacked,

"Carrying water?"

TB — 9/12/2012 7:35:25 PM (archived)

Let's not discuss "carrying water" without mentioning the tanker trucks the liberals here have been hauling around for Obama and the Democrats.

For that matter, maybe we shouldn't be discussing "knee-jerk hate" without mentioning the paragraphs of bile spewed here against conservatives and Republicans.

The whole thread (14 posts)

Is knee-jerk hate driving the Romney agitprop machine? - ER - 9/12/2012 1:26:05 PM
- What a response worthy of a presidential candidate look like from John McCain - BuckGalaxy - 9/12/2012 10:40:47 PM
- Yeah, I'm watching the media circling the wagons around their hero today. - TB - 9/12/2012 4:12:52 PM
  - Obviously the 9/11 timing was not a cooincidence. - alcaray - 9/12/2012 5:00:55 PM
  - Of course the attacks were inspired by Islamic terrorists. - ER - 9/12/2012 4:46:10 PM
    - Look around. I'm not the one doing the "spinning" here. - TB - 9/12/2012 5:01:55 PM
      - If Romney didn't want to be attacked, - ER - 9/12/2012 5:29:07 PM
        
        "Carrying water?" - TB - 9/12/2012 7:35:25 PM
        
        This is the dawning of the Age of Aquarius, Age of Aquarius , ahhhh... - ER - 9/12/2012 8:39:56 PM
        
        let's come up with a working definition for "carrying water" - alcaray - 9/12/2012 7:54:00 PM
        
        As long as we're defining "carrying water..." - TB - 9/12/2012 8:52:10 PM
        
        I'm inclined to agree with your proposal... - alcaray - 9/12/2012 10:55:00 PM
      - On inspection, that does not seem to be true - alcaray - 9/12/2012 5:27:23 PM
- Romney doubles down on his campaign's remarks. - ER - 9/12/2012 3:10:50 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (14 posts)

Related discussions