Why not engage in intellectual discussion?
I recognize that you may have no real rebuttal to what I've posted here in this thread, but why make it so obvious that you cannot engage in an intellectual discussion of these issues?
However, since you choose to abstain from any discussion, I'll just note in passing that, in typical fashion, you have employed the not very heroic tactic of distort and run:
Good grief, he's blaming an Evil Jewish Conspiracy for everything.
The Mossad is an Israeli, not Jewish, spy agency. Judaism is a faith, Israel a nation. It's really not very precise - intellectually dishonest actually - to use the two terms interchangeably in this case.
Further, I think most rational persons would recognize that the Mossad no more represents the views, desires, or ideology of all Israelis any more than the CIA does for all Americans.
To suggest that an agency of any nation, or any nation itself, for that matter, is above examination, beyond reproach, or immune to criticism amounts to a kind of special pleading for exclusive status, or special privileges, as if the nation and its people have been deified, and can do no wrong.
I would submit that no person, agency or nation should be granted immunity; to do so would allow that person, agency or nation to act with impunity, and indeed, that is what the record suggests.
S
