Current Events » in reply to Why not engage in intellectual discussion?

The whole thread (18 posts)

• Disinformation and those phantom Iraqi WMD - S - 2/1/2004 9:42:04 PM
  • The British leadership, using the same intel, has been vindicated of conspiring to hype the intel - ebnelson - 2/1/2004 10:40:10 PM
    • Bush acted in "good faith"?? - Lindy - 2/2/2004 4:52:37 AM
      • Contrails, cropcircles, alien conspiracies, (n/t) - ebnelson - 2/2/2004 1:25:47 PM
    • Why do we even bother responding to this guy? - Tom Brosz - 2/1/2004 10:49:15 PM
      • Why not engage in intellectual discussion? - S - 2/2/2004 3:16:04 AM
        • When do you think the left might try? - ebnelson - 2/2/2004 1:31:22 PM
          • Gee, thanks. - Mary Anne - 2/2/2004 1:53:59 PM
            • Should have been more specific - ebnelson - 2/2/2004 7:37:02 PM
            • re: Gee, thanks. - Tom Brosz - 2/2/2004 5:02:24 PM
              • bingo (n/t) - Fox - 2/5/2004 5:04:33 PM
        • Frankly, that excuse is getting old. - Tom Brosz - 2/2/2004 4:21:40 AM
          • Neither was it an excuse, nor is one needed - S - 2/2/2004 7:01:29 PM
            • I notice you addressed none of the inconsistencies I mentioned. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 2/3/2004 12:07:36 AM
              • Those "inconsistencies" are irrelevant to this thread - S - 2/3/2004 2:07:16 AM
                • You are not in charge of the agenda - ebnelson - 2/3/2004 4:07:25 AM
      • Who, ED? (the wack job) (n/t) - Lindy - 2/2/2004 3:15:08 AM
      • Good point. He is just another Wild Bill Cooper wackjob (n/t) - ebnelson - 2/2/2004 1:44:58 AM