Clinton (correctly) considered the Vietnam war immoral, so his refusal to take part in it is laudable. Bush, on the other hand . . .

Current Events » in reply to Clearly, Bill Clinton's years of military experience (dodging the draft) qualified him to be president, at least in terms of military knowledge.

Odin — 2/10/2004 3:17:20 AM (archived)

. . . supported the war but pulled strings so he wouldn't be among those who did the fighting and/or dying. This is NOT laudable.

Bush's image is one of pious integrity. The historical record suggests it's a false image.

The whole thread (11 posts)

George McGovern also has the Great Military Epiphany - Tom Brosz - 2/9/2004 7:18:37 PM
- How much military experience did FDR have? - Larry J - 2/10/2004 8:01:32 PM
- Maybe you should run for president, Tom - Odin - 2/10/2004 3:37:07 AM
  - Are you going to deal with my grammar, or the facts? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 2/10/2004 3:53:19 AM
    - Hyperbole aint grammar and your "facts" aint facts. (I pointed out some of your non-facts. Wasn't that obvious to you?)) (n/t) - Odin - 2/10/2004 4:25:31 AM
      - re: facts. - Tom Brosz - 2/10/2004 4:30:02 AM
        
        You flatter yourself - Odin - 2/10/2004 7:06:09 AM
- Clearly, Bill Clinton's years of military experience (dodging the draft) qualified him to be president, at least in terms of military knowledge. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 2/9/2004 7:29:47 PM
  - Clinton (correctly) considered the Vietnam war immoral, so his refusal to take part in it is laudable. Bush, on the other hand . . . - Odin - 2/10/2004 3:17:20 AM
    - rotf&lmfao @u - ebnelson - 2/10/2004 4:08:12 AM
  - It's frustrating - Tom Brosz - 2/9/2004 7:53:40 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (11 posts)