Red Herring, Tom
"because the source is the Weekly Standard, this interview is a complete fabrication"
Never said that, never even implied that.
"How about actually getting into arguing about the interview, so we can get past that? Do you actually have an argument other that "he has to be lying?" Maybe some inconsistencies, dates that don't match, something real?
"
Don't make me laugh. I'm not arguing the piece with you, because you already proclaimed position on those who would argue about it. So whats the point?
Are you so damn dense you don't even get what I was pointing out to you? Good God, I have known wind-up toys that were less predictable than your rhetoric.
Davin L.